The Browning of America

http://www.theroot.com/blogs/latino-births/browning-america

The article that I found about this topic is from The Root. Based on this website, recent U.S census shows that white births are no longer a majority in the United States. Therefore the notion of "the browning of America" has come about. To be honest, this topic is a bit insulting on behalf of those who are of colored skin. With the browing of America, there is the notion of fear amongst the Anglo Saxon race who are afraid the increase of the brown population would have a negative affect on them. Also, there are a bunch of assumptions about these "brown people" that are true but only to an extent and can't be reflected on each individual. One of them being that each "brown person" would be more likely to vote democratic because they do not believe in "American" values. Concerning this issue, the article says,

"Writing for Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum, "Roger" said of the new figures, "It is not a good thing. The immigrants do not share American values, so it is a good bet that they will not be voting Republican when they start voting in large numbers."

On examiner.com, "Political Buzz" columnist Ryan Witt was more blunt: "Simply put, Republicans will find it impossible to win any national election in the future if the current percentages stay the same."

This raises questions such as, "who's to determine what American values are?" and "How is one able to determine weather or not these immigrants will be voting Democrat or Republic?"

Chapter 16: The 1980s & Beyond

Chapter 16 of the text focuses on different ways the U.S government tried to gain control over immigration patterns in the United States. Prior to this set of "reforms", the earlier set sought to reverse existing American immigration policy. During this second set of "reforms", the goverment simply sought to modify existing policies. During this time, there was a notion that U.S should gain or regain control of the country's borders. In addition to that, gain control over the economy, welfare and drugs in  America.

During the early 1980's, Senator Alan Simpson and Democrat Romano L. Mazzoli, came up with bills that proposed to raise the numerical limits. The bill also sought to decrease the number of immigrants by placing all relatives within the quotas. Thirdly, the bill would also have abolished the fifith preference, therefore inhibiting the chain migration of recent immigrants. The bill never passed but after years of debate, an immigration act, known as The Immigration Reform Act of 1986, was passed. The act contained four major provisions:

1. Amnesty
2. Requirements that employers verify the eligibility of all newly hired employees
3. Provision of seemigly "tough" sanctions
4. Special provisions to make it easier for growers to import foreign agricultural workers

In order for an individual to be considered for amnesty, an illegal alien had to apply formally to the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The process for amnesty was a long one and if an individual did not meet a certain step, then the amnesty relapses and he or she will be an illegal alien, once again. The idea of amnesty was based on good intention was ultimately had fallouts such as new nativism, criminals and the inability for people to see their families for longer periods of time. On page 396 of the text (third paragraph), it states, "The foolish notion that the various provisions of the law would combine to solve the problem of illegal aliens is already apparent to almost everyone except high officials of the Immigration and Naturalization Service."

Reading about the different attempts to solve the "problem" of immigration is interesting because it makes a person wonder if there is at all a solution to please both sides of the party. I, personally feel that there is not. The issue of immigration is so complex that I feel, by "solving" one aspect of it, it weakens another aspect. There's also the whole notion of racism and discrimination. One of the things I remember reading in the text that I found very interesting is found on page 401. It talks about how there are relatively large amounts of Irish people who are illegal immigrants to the United States. I feel that when people think of "illegal immigrants", people automatically think about Latinos, which I find to be unfair. I understand that the U.S governement was, and still is, trying to gain control over their borders as well as the economy, but it makes me wonder, what gives these officials the right to deny a certain group of people from entering the country? In the end, Americans are people who at one point sought to create a better life for themselves and their families.

Chapter 15: Caribbeans, Central Americans, & Soviet Jews

Chapter 15 of the text focuses on groups that have emigrated to America from the Caribbean, Central America and the Soviet Union. What many of these groups have in common is that they seem to have founded their own communities along the east side, including New York and Florida. These are also groups that found refugee in America because of corruption that took place in the countries they lived in. The text focues on Cubans, Dominicans, Haitians, Central Americans and Soviet Jews.

One of the groups that I found interesting were the Cubans. Thomas Jefferson thought that Cuba would eventually become a part of America. Prior to the American Civil War, there were schemes for annexation of Cuba concocted by southern politicians. In 1898, Cuba became indpendent but was an American protectorate. This lasted for six years. During this period, Cubans were able to come and leave the United States. In the 1950s, Cuba was still going through major political unrest and this sent even more Cubans to the United States. What I found interesting about this section on Cubans is that even if these Cubans emigrated from the same country, they are still divided based on skin color, white Cuban Americans and black Cubans. Page 375 of the book states in the middle of the second paragraph, "Black Cuban refugees have reported housing and other discrimination in the Miami area, including discriminination in predominantly Cuban areas and from Cuban American landlords." Reading this was interesting because it's easy to assume that groups that emigrate from the same areas would try to "stick together". That is obviously not the case here, provided the fact that Cubans had been divided or classified based on their skin color. Not only that, but Cubans were even discriminated by other Cubans. There were white Cubans who faced poverty in the United States, but that was usually due to the fact that the individual was elderly or if the indviduals lived in households headed by woman.

This issue of discrimination and unfairness was also present among the Haitians. Haiti was a country of poverty. The text even described it as a "desperate" country. A statistic that struck me is found on page 378 (second paragraph), "The World Bank estimated a few years ago that, in the mountainous countryside where most of the people live, nine out of ten Haitians live below what it calls the 'absolute poverty level' of $135 a year, or $.37 a day." Just like the Cubans, Haitians suffered from misrule. Although, unlike the Cubans, Haitians weren't really welcomed in the United States. On page 379 of the text (second paragraph) it states, "Unlike the Cuabns, who are welcomed as refugees from the communism, the Haitians were unwanted refugees from hunger." The text explains that if the United States government were to automatically accept the claims of asylum seekers, then it could be assumed that anyone could enter American territory without uderging screening in countries of first asylum. Although, many argue that the U.S applies their rules selectively and that the Haitians were discriminated because of their skin color.

Chapter 14: The New Asian Immigrants

Chapter 14 focuses on Asian groups such as the Japanese, Chinese, Filipinos, Asian Indians, Koreans and the Vietnamese. The group that struck my interest the most would be the Filipinos. Not only is it because I'm able to relate to it due to the fact that I am of Filipino ancestry, but because it's interesting to see what events led up to the current status of Filipinos in America. The chapter talks about how there were three distinct increments of Filipinos coming to America. The first being in 1898. During this increment, students came from the Philippines, settling in the midwest and the east. The second incrememnet took place in the 1920's and the early 1930's. During this increment, many farm workers came, settling mostly in Hawaii and California. The third increment which took place from 1965 and is still in effect as of current. During this increment, educated Filipinos and would-be entrepeneurs find their way to America.

Majority of the Filipinos that immigrated were known to be Roman Catholic. On page 356 of the text, the last sentence of the first paragraph states, "Majority of each increment, like most Filipinos, have been Roman Catholics, but religion does not seem to play a major institutional role in the lives of most Filipino Americans." Because of the way I was raised and from personal experiences, I find that statement to be false. I grew up in communities with large rates of the Filipino population present. A great number of the people I know or have come across, that are of Filipino descent, have some sort of affiliation with a church. Although there are many individuals who are not religious, their families have some sort of connection to a church or are rooted in religion somehow. Religion also plays a large role in Filipino customs and traditions.

Another thing that I found interesting was the anti Filipino movement that took place prior to WWII. A good deal of violence was directed toward this group and it was a movement similar to that of the Chinese and Japanese. They were seen as savages and because they worked "for nothing" they were seen as a problem because they basically took jobs from the white people. This goes back to the notion of the ethnic escalator and the fear of the dwindling of the Anglo Saxon dominance. The sad truth is that such prejudice stil exists today. There's even a gap between Filipinos Americans and Filipino immigrants. Many Filipinos that are born in America view themselves as American and therefore of "higher class". With this comes the labeling of those immigrating from the Philippines to be "FOB" (Fresh off the boat).

Chapter 17: Immigration in an Age of Globalization

Before reaching this chapter, the book has covered the fact that American immigration (before 1986) has mostly demonstrated continutity. Although, there have been changes in attitudes toward immigration, therefore resulting in changes in immigration law and regulations.This chapter focuses on more current ideas and views on immigration, in this age of globilzation. Immigration has continued to grow within the past years; between the years 1981-2000, would be the heaviest period in immigration history. The chapter mentions the increase of refugees and asylees. Also, there are no more just legal immigrants, but there are "nonimmigrant" immigrants. These are people who enter the country on various kinds of visas that don't entitle them to apply for permanenet resident status.

While reading this chapter and taking into consideration the information presented in previous chapters, one realizes how complex the concept of immigration is. Toward the end of the chapter, the text talks about how being able to control the country's borders could be impossible.

Beside that, one section that I found particularly interesting is found on page 413, beginning with the second paragraph:

"What all these data tell us is that generalizations about the socioeconomic status of contemporary immigrants, when lumped together, are largely meaningless and misleading. Only when we are able to particularize and focus on individual groups, and on classes within those groups, is it possible to speak with any degree of precision."

This is speaking in regards to each group's experience in America. I find it interesting because it makes me think, perhaps by focusing on each ethnic group by itself, there could be a better understanding on immigration and how to handle the issue of immigration in the future.

My Family's Traditional Filipino Thanksgiving

As far as I'm concerned, my family basically celebrates Thanksgiving the same way other non-Filipino families do. For our family, Thanksgiving is a day when our families - aunties, uncles, cousins, nieces, nephews, brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers - come together to spend quality time together. Besides giving thanks, the main attraction would be the food. I feel that there is a more sentimental value this time around, in prepping and cooking the meal together.

Thanksgiving isn't celebrated in the Philippines; Christmas would be as close as it gets to Thanksgiving. So, of course depending on the family's preference, a lot of Filipino families embrace the fact that they are in America and try out non-Filipino customs.

Although, I did find this article online:

http://asianjournalusa.com/americas-thanksgiving-and-the-philippines-national-heroes-day-two-holida-p3692-141.htm

Oral History Report

Here is my 3-4 minute presentation of my findings.

Minorities from Other Regions: Chinese, Japanese, and French Canadians

Here are my notes, for Chapter 9 in the book. They are organized by section and pages. 

INTRO:

·      Many authors argued that the Chinese were mere sojourners and not immigrants at all.

·      These arguments now have little attractiveness

·      First two Asian groups to immigrate: Chinese & Japanese

·      Major discrete group from Canada: French Canadian

·       

CHINESE:

Pg. 239

·      First immigrants from Asia

·      Meaningful immigration to the US starts with the California gold rush of 1849

o   “This identification of California- and America- with gold was so prevalent in the Chinese mind”

o   Within the next decade, another gold rush took some Chinese to Australia

·      These Chinese came with the intention of sojourning & returning with a nest egg.

·      By definition/qualification: “change of residence involving the crossing of an international boundary” – settles dispute that the Chinese were also immigrants.

·      “Between the beginnings of Chinese migration in 1848 and the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882, perhaps 300,00 Chinese entered the US”

o   Population hits intercensal peak of 125,000 in early 1880s

Pg. 240

·      Migratory tradition (involving migration to SE Asia)

·      19^th century: Western entrepreneurs imported unfree Chinese labor to parts of the plantation world, largely as surrogates for African slaves. “COOLIE TRADE”

o   First brought Chinese to Trinidad in the Caribbean (1808)

o   “some employers literally worked their coolies to death before their indentures ran out.”

Pg. 241 (Financing of emigration)

·      Borrowed from Chinese moneylenders

o   Would borrow $75, but would owe $200

·      Draw on family resources

·      Utilize rotating credit mechanisms

·      Large amount of Cantonese (for almost a century)

·      Sex ration, “Chinese males outnumbered females by more than 20 to 1”

Pg. 242

o   Chinese concentrated in the West, Cali in particular (pg.241)

o   Made SF the port of entry, dai fou (big city)

o   More than a 5^th of Chinese Americans living there by 1880/90 census

o   Were increasingly urbanites

o   Ethnic enclaves, Chinatowns

o   SF Chinatown was the first & most important

o   “Places where Chinese Americans lived, worked, shopped and socialized”

o   Provided for themselves, shops, services, communal organizations and entertainment

Pg. 243 Economic

o   First largely occupied in mining

o   California alone: 5^th in mining, 5^th laborers, 7^th in agriculture, 7^th in manufacturing (shoes & clothing), 7^th domestic servants, 10^th laundry workers

o   30,000 outside of Cali (1880) concentrated in mining, common labor and service trades

o   Hundreds of Chinese owned/operated farms, played vital entrepreneurial role in Cali agriculture (introduced new crops and pioneered distribution systems)

o   Merchants = Top of Chinese American economic pyramid

Pg. 244-245 Organizations

o   Churches weren’t major organizations

o   Focus was on family, associations united those with a common last name

o   Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association, “Chinese Six Companies”

o   Run by the elite

o   Became spokesmen for the Chinese American community

o   Helped new arrivals find jobs and housing, fed the hungry, nursed sick, buried the dead (arranged for bones to be sent back to China)

o   Exercised “social control” – encouraged members to conform to certain community norms, with implied benefits or protection for those who deviated from them.

o   Settled disputes

o   Tongs – notorious criminal organization linking to crime such as prostitution, gambling and drugs

o   “Hatchet men” –thugs who soon used guns

Pg. 245-246

o   The Naturalization Act of 1870

o   Aliens ineligible for citizenship

o   Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882

o   Made them the only ethnic group in the world that could not freely immigrate to the US.

o   Froze the Chinese community in its 1882 configuration

o   Made it essentially a bachelor society

o   “Paper sons” – buy the right, on paper, to be someone else’s son

o   Protected those who were born in the US, who were therefore born citizens

o   Great San Francisco earthquake & fire of 1906 destroyed birth records à enabled many to make fraudulent claims of American citizenship.

JAPANESE:

Pg. 250

o   Japan had no long emigrant tradition, unlike the Chinese

o   First group came in 1869, hey were political refugees

o   1869- About 150 were brought to Hawaii to work in sugar plantations

o   Renewed in 1884, 30,000 were brought under contract to plantation workers

o   Beginning in the 1890s – small but significant numbers arrived in North American Pacific Ports (San Francisco, Seattle, and Vancouver)

Pg. 251-252

o   According to charts, the Japanese community had a more “normal” look

o   Males still predominated, but they were ‘only” 65.5 percent of the population

o   Females, just over a third of the population

o   “The Japanese would become younger and more native born; the Chinese would change much more slowly. As of 1940 more than two-thirds of the 125,000 Japanese Americans were native born citizens...”

Pg. 253-254 Working in Agriculture

o   By 1900, economic focus was in agriculture

o   Would replace aging Chinese who were becoming more urban

o   Large numbers were from farm families

o   By 1904, they farmed more than 150,000 acres of land; 1919, more than 450,000 (in California alone)

o   Soon, LA became the quintessential city of Japanese America

o   Dominated in the production of fresh green veggies and some fruit crops

Pg. 254-255

o   Japanese immigrants & their children were highly successful

o   Made a significant contribution in the West

o   Seen as a threat à something like the Chinese Exclusion Act would have been put into lace, except the government feared the Japanese military

o   The Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1907/8

o   Ended the immigration of Japanese laborers, by having the Japanese govt. refuse to issue passports to such persons

o   Allowed for family unification

o   Forced Japanese immigration into an essentially female mode

o   “Picture bride marriage”

o   Developed differentiated generational lines

o   Immigrant generation: Issei, their children: Nisei

Pg. 256-257 Organizations

o   Cultural organizations

o   Japanese Association of America, headquarters in San Francisco

o   Delegated by Tokyo

o   Most important of the documents that they handled were those needed to get a passport for an existing wide or bride

o   The Japanese government encouraged Japanese to acculturate

o   Acculturation was quite rapid

o   Religious organizations among the Japanese Americans were diverse.

o   Many continued practicing Buddhism

o   Large minority were/became Christian

o   “It doesn’t matter what religion, just as long as you go to church” attitude

FRENCH CANADIANS:

Pg 259

o   Just how many French Canadians came is all but impossible to determinate

o   Quebec- the combination of hardscrabble soil & a short growing season made agriculture difficult

o   Hundreds of thousands came between the end of the Civil War and the turn of the century

Pg. 259-261 Story of Jeanne

Jeanne la Fileuse by Honore Beaugrand

Implied lifestyle through story:

o   Took trains to get to their destinations

o   Allowed to work at a young age

o   Worked as mill workers (making about $1.22 a day), pay for children

would depend on age and ability

o   Conditions were somewhat like slavery

o   Immigrants lived, worked and socialized almost exclusively among their own kind

o   Attended Catholic church

o   Slower acculturation

Pg. 262

o   French Canadian Catholics worshipped in three different kinds of parishes

o   National Parish- They were the dominant group & had a Quebecois priest, with main services in French

o   Mixed Parish- Large number of French Canadians, bilingual services, no Quebecois priest

o   Parishes in which all services were in English, substantial French Canadian membership

Pg. 263-264

o   Relatively slow acculturation may also be seen in the political arena

o   Had one of the lowest naturalization rates

o   The rate of intermarriage by French Canadians was very low

 3-5 Proposed Exam Questions:

1. What were the push/pull factors of the Chinese?

2. What were the push/pull factors of the Japanese?

3. What were the push/pull factors of the French Canadian?

4. Knowing that the Chinese and the Japanese were the first Asian groups to immigrate to the United States, what did they have in common? What were their difference?

Current Events Related to 2012 Elections

Rhea May Marcelino

America’s Ethnic History

28 September 2012

Current Events

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/27/politics/campaign-wrap/index.html?hpt=hp_inthenews

• ·      Obama and Romney spent time appealing to veterans in Virginia.
• ·      Neither served in the military.
• ·      Connected to those in the defense industry
• ·      13 that usually vote Republican went for Obama last time.
• ·      "I want a military so strong, nobody wants to test it," Romney said
• ·      Romney pledges to use the money saved in the defense budget to care for the veterans.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/27/politics/romney-strategists/index.html

• ·      Less time trying to define his opponent
• ·      Spend more time explaining how he would handle job as president
• ·      "They are going to have to run a more disciplined campaign. He needs to make the connection of what the state of the economy is and what his policies are."
• ·      Tries to, with a new series of ad.
• ·      “Some Republican strategists see the upcoming economic-themed debate as an opportunity for Romney to recover.”

http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Obama-leads-Romney-throughout-Calif-3876089.php

• ·      Obama leads Romney by a 58-34 percent margin
• ·      Voters view Romney’s Vice President negatively

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/immigration-obama-romney-agree-virtually/story?id=17273505#1

• ·      “Romney has significant ground to make up with Latinos, who support Obama by a 35 point margin according to an August NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Telemundo poll.”
• ·      Romney currently has the support of only 23% of Latinos.
• ·      Romney taking the side of, “The answer is self-deportation”
• ·      Obama taking the side of, "It makes no sense to expel talented young people, who, for all intents and purposes, are Americans"

Chapter 4: Other Europeans in Colonial America

Overall, I found this chapter very interesting. I'm not sure about other people, but when I think about immigration during the times of Colonial America, I mainly think about those that immigrated from Europe. That may sound a bit arrogant, but it's the truth. There were two sentence that, I guess you can say, strike me the most, within the first page of the reading. One of them was, ".., just over three-fifths of the white population was calculated to have been of English stock, and more than two-fifths of the rest came from the British Isles." The second one was, "one white in fourteen could not be assigned an ethnicity by the scholars who produced the table below more than half a century ago." The first sentence goes to show that a lot of what makes up our population not only come from Europe, but from the British Isles as well (Of course, this does not include Native Americans and those that immigrated from Africa). The second sentence goes to show that the notion of assimilation took place during the colonial times. Immigration to colonial America was a big thing, whether the reason be push or pull. Those who immigrated are also those of different ethnic backgrounds. Chapter three talks about groups such as: Germans, Scotch Irish, Scots, Irish, Welsh, French, Spanish, Swedes, and Jews.

When I think about the immigration and and all the different groups that immigrated, I think about the history of Hawaii. One of the great reasons why people immigrated to Hawaii was to work in the plantation fields. In fact, my grandparents were one of the many that did just that. Labor force was imported from countries such as, but not limiting to, Korea, China, Japan and the Philippines. Majority of those that immigrated found this as an opportunity for a better life, much like those that immigrated to Colonial America. Also, just like Colonial America times, these ethnic groups either assimilated or acculturated.

Chapter 3: "Slavery and Immigrants from Africa"

While reading this chapter, I became a lot more interested and fascinated by the history of African Americans. Growing up, students learn that the first Africans to come to America were those that were brought in because of slavery. I don't know why, but until the reading, it never occurred to me, that the importing of slaves to America could be seen as "forced immigration". America is a nation filled with different ethnicities and cultures. It's not everyday that you stop to think about when and where each ethnic group gets their start here.

I think the thing that intrigued me the most was what was written in the last paragraph of page 55, "The contemporary documents generated about African slaves are all written by slave traders, masters, and other white observers." On page 56, it also says, "We do not even know the names of the Africans who came here, only what their masters decided to call them." I didn't necessarily feel bad, it's just a sad thought to think about how true those statements are. Yes, the status of Africans bettered throughout time, but it's interesting to know that white observers were basically the reason why Africans had their start in America.

About two semesters ago, I took a cultural anthropology class. In that class, we talked about the origin of the human race. According to that class, the origin of the human race is Africa, which I found ironic.

Pacific Seafarers and Maritime Cultures

The packet entitled, "Prehistory: Pacific Seafarers and Maritime Cultures" focuses on the origins of seafaring, the Kelp highway and Polynesians in the Pacific. While reading this article, a few thoughts crossed my mind. One thing that I couldn't help but think about is the fact that the subject of history itself is a mystery. Yes we have evidence of certain things that have occurred in the past. But what about the events in the past that we do not have evidence of? How can we be certain that something took place in the first place? The reason why this thought came to mind was because of what I read within the first page or two of the article. In the introduction, the text presents the question of: "If our ancestors didn't fish or forage along coastlines, cross water barriers, or colonize islands for 2.49 million years, how did they spread around the world? How and when did humans colonize the coastlines and islands of the Pacific?"(Pg. 8). From there, the author goes into depth about seafaring and about coastal economies.

Honestly, I found this packet a bit difficult to read. Although, one way that I was able to make the reading a bit more relatable was the fact that the reading concerned the Pacific and Polynesians. I think that the reason why I find it so interesting is because of the fact that, growing up, the schools that I attended would teach students the history of the Pacific. Being that I'm from Hawai'i, the social studies classes that I had, would focus on the history of Hawai'i and so I guess it's safe to say that that is something I am used to hearing about. It's also interesting to learn that the early seafarers had the ability to use the ocean to their advantage and construct boats to travel and settle on new land. They also had great skill when it came to survival at sea and having to depend on marine life.